According to BBC Shakespeare Animated Tales-Julius Caesar, Brutus supposed to not kill Julius Caesar because it only makes Romans rebel especially Mark Antony. Brutus should think about the murdering deeply and do not follow on Cassius advice.

Julius Caesar is the most influence people in Rome, Brutus should know that. By killing Rome dictator, it only put himself in trouble. Even though Caesar was not a good person but he still loves Brutus. He provides the best education for Brutus and Brutus have to think wisely before make the decision to kill his adopted father.

Brutus should realize without Caesar he is nothing. By killing Caesar is not a noble motive but it is more to revenge because the idea derives from Cassius not him. Cassius seems like to hate on Caesar because he had all the title and respect from Romans even though he is a bad person.

Caesar is an old man and he would not protect himself if all the 12 persons attack him. The consequences of the murder also not been thought by Brutus, because of Cassius words he does not think the results on his action.

In conclusion, Brutus has no reason to kill his adopted father because Caesar is an old man. Brutus actually did not respect him as a father although Caesar had killed thousands of people but he still cares on Brutus.

Ancient Behaving Badly; Julius Caesar

Due to the documentary, Caesar is a psychopath. He has no mercy towards children and women. He is a bisexual and enjoys his sex life with aristocrats’ wives and believes he can dominate all people around him. He is actually was a great dictator, he manage to guide Rome in a supreme place before century. He knows how to handle the politics and armies.

At the first, when he is a captive to the pirates, he shows his credibility by promising to kill the pirates soon after the ransom; he fulfilled the promises and crucifies all of them. This is ridiculous because he did this to others who are innocent. He loves revenge and he loves to torture people he also did not care on others feeling. However it is good to maintain the peaceful of Rome. But sadly, it only makes him feel like he is the perfect dictator.

But then, he became more powerful after he is appointed as governor even though he is in big debt. To solve the issue, he tries to conquer the unconquered Gaul. He also using hi-technology weapon which is a designed arrow with space for them to put in something such as ball of fire to defeat the enemy. This is good because he wanted to defend the Rome Empire. However he is over the boundaries where he does not allowed women, children, old citizens’ fugitive to enter the Rome because Rome is only for Romans.

The desperation of war fugitives do not make him changed his mind. He shows the anger by let them die in starvation. He has no humanity. Therefore, his action is not necessary in order to safeguard the superiority of Rome. He enjoys himself by seen them being tortured. 

Jack the Ripper in America..

Question:

There were many suspects in the JTR murders over the years. What are the evidences that support the claim that James Kelly was JTR? If you are a rival detective, how do you eliminate all the evidence that you've identified in the documentary?

Jack the Ripper was mainly known in London. After a few years, he pops up in New York, America and killed another whore. It is true the vicious evidence was made by him? Based from the information that been stated in the documentary.  An investigator Ed Norris, open up the cold case file after a century. He wanted to solve all the cases and he believes there’s someone who can be a prime suspect. He suspected James Kelly.

*************************************

The first victim of Jack the Ripper in America was Carrie Brown 56 year old prostitute. She was killed with the same method as London Jack the Ripper. Because of that, the authorities assume the evidence is made by him. There are three major suspects, but, from time to time, Ed Noris eliminate the other two suspects; Seweryn Klosowski and Francis Tumblety.

**********************************

The rival detective will disagree on this statement. It can be argued because how furnisher upholster can remove all the organs and mutilate all his victims. A person without any knowledge of human anatomy cannot cut a body very fine just like Jack the Ripper done on his prey. Next, James Kelly only cut his wife throat but he does not cut his wife organs. Basically, the London serial killer took some part of the organ, so that, someone cannot simply accuse James Kelly is the serial killer. Another thing, other man can easily imitate Jack the Ripper style of killing to fright people in America. 

************************************

The documentary also makes the viewer believe a London serial killer is James Kelly. But, he never had been prosecuted because the truth is not there. The documentary only makes an assumption but not a fact.

**********************************

~THE END~

FROM HELL: Johnny Depp ^_^

1.    question:

           Distinguish between facts and fictions that are portrayed in the movie @ Which aspect of the plot that is accurate to the historical fact in the JTR murders and which aspect of the plot that is based on the filmmakers' own imagination.

             After spending two hours to examine ‘From Hell’ I can conclude the murderer was a notorious in that era. In 1888, there is a person who likes to kill a prostitute in Whitechapel known as ‘Jack the Ripper’. He kills and mutilates his victims meanly. The news of it is extremely disseminated around London; many of Londoners assume the killer is a Jewish because they do not like them manipulate the economy in that time. 

2@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

        According on the film, the names of victims are accurate; the filmmakers did not exaggerate on it. The condition of the victims dies also followed the facts. Next, the chronology of the victims killed also the same with the fact given.

   

  

  

     @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

             Jack the Ripper is a surgeon. Before inspector Abberline; an investigator in charged, found the exactly killer, he named several of suspect. One of the suspect names is Benjamin Kidney but his name does not even stated in the book. Then, the second lady (Annie Chapman) was killed at Hanover Street but she had been killed at Hanbury Street according to the fact. For the last case, in the film, the heart of the victim is taken out and the killer put it in the kettle. Meanwhile, the fact is the victim heart is gone. Furthermore, in film, inspector Abberline is a heavily opium addict. Lastly, Marry Jean Kelly was not murdered in the film instead, the one who killed is her friend named Ada a girl from France. In the text, it does not happen.

 

~THE END~

ANCIENT ALIENS: THE EVIDENCE..

State several evidence which support the ancient astronaut theory. Discuss whether you agree or disagree to the evidence that you have identified.

Based on the documentary, millions of people trust that we have been visited by alien in the past, due to the artefact that had been inheritance to us. For example, French archaeology found a small wooden like a bird artefact in the oldest burial ground at Sakkara, Egypt. Second, in a dense jungle lives Colombian civilisation known as a Tolima, restrain an archaeology artefact just like a modern jet. Next, spaceship called ‘Rukma Vimana’ found in Indian subcontinent ancient. Vimana’s is like a space ship using a jet engine or using spinning bright light called gyroscope in modern to find its velocity. Other evidence is a flying machine in utopian civilization. In book of ‘Eziekel’, there is a spaceship called Eziekel spaceship exist and supported by Joseph Bloomerg from NASA.

##############################################

By study the documentary, I dispute to the evidence. It is because if ancient truly invented a space craft or space ship, it must be prove on each artefact, for instance, a piece of it. People in ancient has a huge of fantasy, they can imagine so many things. They also believe in magic, by using their imagination and spell, they easily create a new thing. Everything that has been made by them is coincidence to a modern life. There is a fact, if we look at the moon and we want to see smiling face, it will appear because our brain interpreted on what we wanted to see. So, I strongly agree that ancient ancestor had has invented a flying transportation and has been visited by an alien.

###############################################

~THE END~