Sunday, September 30, 2012
There were many suspects in the JTR murders over the years. What are the evidences that support the claim that James Kelly was JTR? If you are a rival detective, how do you eliminate all the evidence that you've identified in the documentary?
Jack the Ripper was mainly known in London. After a few years, he pops up in New York, America and killed another whore. It is true the vicious evidence was made by him? Based from the information that been stated in the documentary. An investigator Ed Norris, open up the cold case file after a century. He wanted to solve all the cases and he believes there’s someone who can be a prime suspect. He suspected James Kelly.
The first victim of Jack the Ripper in America was Carrie Brown 56 year old prostitute. She was killed with the same method as London Jack the Ripper. Because of that, the authorities assume the evidence is made by him. There are three major suspects, but, from time to time, Ed Noris eliminate the other two suspects; Seweryn Klosowski and Francis Tumblety.
The rival detective will disagree on this statement. It can be argued because how furnisher upholster can remove all the organs and mutilate all his victims. A person without any knowledge of human anatomy cannot cut a body very fine just like Jack the Ripper done on his prey. Next, James Kelly only cut his wife throat but he does not cut his wife organs. Basically, the London serial killer took some part of the organ, so that, someone cannot simply accuse James Kelly is the serial killer. Another thing, other man can easily imitate Jack the Ripper style of killing to fright people in America.
The documentary also makes the viewer believe a London serial killer is James Kelly. But, he never had been prosecuted because the truth is not there. The documentary only makes an assumption but not a fact.
Wrote by surianyjamaluddin at 10:50 PM
Distinguish between facts and fictions that are portrayed in the movie @ Which aspect of the plot that is accurate to the historical fact in the JTR murders and which aspect of the plot that is based on the filmmakers' own imagination.
After spending two hours to examine ‘From Hell’ I can conclude the murderer was a notorious in that era. In 1888, there is a person who likes to kill a prostitute in Whitechapel known as ‘Jack the Ripper’. He kills and mutilates his victims meanly. The news of it is extremely disseminated around London; many of Londoners assume the killer is a Jewish because they do not like them manipulate the economy in that time.
According on the film, the names of victims are accurate; the filmmakers did not exaggerate on it. The condition of the victims dies also followed the facts. Next, the chronology of the victims killed also the same with the fact given.
Jack the Ripper is a surgeon. Before inspector Abberline; an investigator in charged, found the exactly killer, he named several of suspect. One of the suspect names is Benjamin Kidney but his name does not even stated in the book. Then, the second lady (Annie Chapman) was killed at Hanover Street but she had been killed at Hanbury Street according to the fact. For the last case, in the film, the heart of the victim is taken out and the killer put it in the kettle. Meanwhile, the fact is the victim heart is gone. Furthermore, in film, inspector Abberline is a heavily opium addict. Lastly, Marry Jean Kelly was not murdered in the film instead, the one who killed is her friend named Ada a girl from France. In the text, it does not happen.
Wrote by surianyjamaluddin at 8:06 PM
Sunday, September 9, 2012
State several evidence which support the ancient astronaut theory. Discuss whether you agree or disagree to the evidence that you have identified.
Based on the documentary, millions of people trust that we have been visited by alien in the past, due to the artefact that had been inheritance to us. For example, French archaeology found a small wooden like a bird artefact in the oldest burial ground at Sakkara, Egypt. Second, in a dense jungle lives Colombian civilisation known as a Tolima, restrain an archaeology artefact just like a modern jet. Next, spaceship called ‘Rukma Vimana’ found in Indian subcontinent ancient. Vimana’s is like a space ship using a jet engine or using spinning bright light called gyroscope in modern to find its velocity. Other evidence is a flying machine in utopian civilization. In book of ‘Eziekel’, there is a spaceship called Eziekel spaceship exist and supported by Joseph Bloomerg from NASA.
By study the documentary, I dispute to the evidence. It is because if ancient truly invented a space craft or space ship, it must be prove on each artefact, for instance, a piece of it. People in ancient has a huge of fantasy, they can imagine so many things. They also believe in magic, by using their imagination and spell, they easily create a new thing. Everything that has been made by them is coincidence to a modern life. There is a fact, if we look at the moon and we want to see smiling face, it will appear because our brain interpreted on what we wanted to see. So, I strongly agree that ancient ancestor had has invented a flying transportation and has been visited by an alien.
Wrote by surianyjamaluddin at 4:42 PM
Based on the facts presented in this documentary are you convinced that fast food is the main cause of obesity in United States and around the world?
Burgers, fries, sodas, bagel, and all fast food make us craving. We love to consume all those foods because we are enthusiast into it. Even though most of us an impact of taking fast food in frequent but we do not take any precaution. In Malaysia, Nowadays, diabetes, heart diseases and stroke have been shot up compared to 1980’s. Cancer also derives from food intake.
It is not a sin to consume fast food as long we know the limit. We can take once a week if we are drooling into it. We cannot simply fulfill our desire to have fast food as a daily meal. Although we are too busy in handling our career but we have to take care our digestive system because all those health problems comes from the food that we take.
Based on the documentary, fast food companies should be blame because they are providing a silly huge size of portion by only added up around $0.30-$1.00, this encourage people to go for ‘Super Size’ because they think it is an economical price with a big plate of a meal. Something develops a wonderful taste on each of the hamburgers or a soda is a food drugs that derives from chemical change in those food substances. These makes people addicted and want it over and over again.
Therefore, I strongly agree that fast food drives people around the world into obesity. As we can see the ingredients in the fast food did not make any sense, for instance, a bottle of fine sugar only for a week of sodas. This is ridiculous why we consuming something bad to our health. Health is wealth!
Wrote by surianyjamaluddin at 4:15 PM